Loading

Categories, Archives and Tags

Pink Chaddis for Valentine’s Day

3
comments

Some of you may have heard the news a couple weeks ago of women who were attacked at a bar in India.  If not, you can read an article about it here.  What happened was members of a group called Sri Ram Sena attacked several women for drinking at a bar and dancing with men.  The group even brought along its own camera crew and videotaped the whole thing.  Not surprisingly, the attack set off a firestorm of debate about women’s freedoms in India.

Thousands of men and women have mobilized online to voice their disapproval and outrage at the attack.  One of these campaigns is called The Pink Chaddi Campaign, organized by the Consortium of Pubgoing, Loose and Forward Women.  I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that chaddis are panties or knickers.  Anyway, the campaign is two-fold.  The first part is to send as many pink chaddis as possible to Sri Ram Sena, the group that attacked the women.   The second part is to go to a bar or pub on Valentine’s Day (today) and raise a toast to Indian women (it’s not necessary to drink alcohol – the point is to make the toast in a bar).

So far, almost 32,000 people have joined the campaign in little more than a week.  They started as a Facebook group, so you can look them up there, or go to their website.  You can also read articles about the campaign here and here.

Now here’s some food for thought.  Sri Ram Sene is planning to disrupt Valentine’s Day because it believes the holiday goes against Indian culture.  The group’s chief, Pramod Muthalik, said,  “Valentine’s day, Friendship Day… all these are international conspiracies against our culture.  They are exploiting the girls by calling it a lover’s day.  Love cannot be for a single day.”

What do you think about that?  Setting aside, for the moment, the fact that this group actually attacked people…what do you think about the justification for their actions?  I’m really interested to hear your thoughts on this because these ideas have recurred throughout history time and again…fighting foreign influences, using religion to drive power struggles, protecting the virtue of women, etc.  How do you tell when people have crossed the line, even when they justify their actions by what appear to be noble goals?

Thanks to G, who has a profound understanding of how powerful pink chaddis can be.  ;)

last post next post

You must be logged in to post a comment ·

silentrocker

February 14, 2009

our politicians commit every sin under the sin – wine, women and song. I support the Pink Chaddis campaign in toto. Let these hypocrites be taught a lesson


foretold

February 16, 2009

That’s what I call a weird coincidence, since I was also wearing red underwear on my head on Valentines day to freighten my neighbour just for fun of it with an a cappella version of the Habanera aria from George Bizet’s opera Carmen :D


artsychica82

January 18, 2010

It always makes me sad that men in religions will take their ‘authority’ to control others. My faith believes that the moment a man uses his [religious gifts] to exert control over others- it is gone… Anyway, religion shouldn’t be about control, all religions have been proven to have similarities in almost every way- just slightly different, many break away and distort things in order to evil.
This makes me so… sad to hear. I really love this site- as I don’t have a tv or read the newspaper often- how wonderful to come here and know about such things. To answer your question, I would reiterate that although religion and it’s organization had proven to uphold some great things in society- it’s when control is used and someone’s free will ‘agency’ is affected that it’s crossed a line…
Laws influence some of our choices because they directly affect others lives but to attack them physically for any means other than to keep them from attacking another- is simply evil, using control, should never exist. I love that people are trying to send a message, but I think there could be a better way to send it.